ohnehalfte: (pic#11622357)
Dr. Newton Geiszler (CRAU) ([personal profile] ohnehalfte) wrote in [community profile] lifeaftr2017-11-19 07:38 pm

TiK Tok

Who: Lup ([personal profile] hellawrath), Taako ([personal profile] ohshitsweetflips), Newt ([personal profile] ohnehalfte), and possibly you!
What: Drunken party of drunkenness and shenanigans
When: Nov 17th, mid-day until everyone passes tf out
Where: Islet #2 aka Trash Island, somewhere out in front of cottage 1 and along the beach
Warnings: Drunk people, swearing, ill-advised people hitting each other with sticks, questionable food, drunken cuddles and crying, etc, etc tbc when there's more




Welcome to Islet 2! There are many reasons for you to be here right now. Maybe you live here. Maybe you're visiting someone who lives here. Maybe you've been invited to this sick party by one of the above idiots. Maybe you were just passing by and got dragged into the festivities. Who cares, really? You're here now!

Out in front of Cottage 1 there's the beautiful banner that you see above hanging on the outside, lovingly crafted by one of the twins. The twins have also lovingly crafted some vodka using magic and potatoes. Potato magic. And hey! There's also stuff that the twins cooked! Like potato tornadoes, fried shark genitals and Fantasy Kentucky Fried Pterax! And other food! And there's a fire! And activities! And drinking!

Mainly drinking. In fact, there is a large cooking pot that, at the moment, is full of the most moonshine-iest vodka you have ever had. There are empty halves of coconut shells to serve as cups, as well as some clay cups that may or may not have come from an interesting source. So help yourself! Who knows how long it'll last, considering the amount of guests. Heck! It might even be repurposed later, after all the vodka is gone! So drink up.

Anyway, feel free to join in on the festivities! There will be several threads for activities where people can mingle, or you can start your own. Have a party, chill out, and/or imbibe ill-advised substances to try and forget that you died. Wheeeee!
prettypurpleparlor: Thinking only (And I've a many curious things)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-02 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
[She looks thoughtful at the mention of 'virtue'.]

Hm, it's funny you should phrase it that way- the basis of our system of magic essentially is one's own virtues, using a particular emotion in order to use one of seven different types of magic.

I don't think faith, specifically, is one of them- although I suppose you could make a case for it falling under one of the others, by definition...
greatcleavage: (confused)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-03 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, strictly speaking, I've made the sword possess magic properties through force of will and mental exertion. Which is basically how magic works, I suppose...
prettypurpleparlor: I have within my pantry (Table ready)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-03 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
That would fit fairly well with how we do things, yes. Although, I'd gotten the impression that you didn't have magical ability, yourself?
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-03 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
That depends on how you define it. It is well within my ability to become a wizard, thus being able to alter the fabric of reality through carefully-studied spells. This is sort of a more... spontaneous thing, and honestly, the boundaries of magic are pretty fuzzy anyway.

As Wrecan put it to me, I harnessed magical power through intense mental focus. Not intentionally and not under my control in any way, but what's the fundamental difference between that and casting a spell?
prettypurpleparlor: Thinking only (And I've a many curious things)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-03 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose there's another obvious difference there, in that people my world are either born with or without magical ability, as opposed to gaining power by study- although someone without magic could still use a magical item, and someone with magic would certainly improve their skill with study.

Keeping in mind that I'm only familiar with our own system, I'd say the difference is something like swinging your hand around and hitting someone by accident as opposed to throwing a proper punch- technically the same end result, but the latter is likely to be more effective and less tiring.
greatcleavage: (typical really)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-04 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, we have the same thing -- sorcerers have innate magical power which they learn to control with practice, as opposed to formalized study to learn how to do that same sort of thing.

To be honest, wizards often look down on sorcerers, out of a belief that what they earned by hard work, sorcerers just possess naturally, which somehow makes the wizard way superior. [The roll of eyes which accompanies this statement ought to make Roy's opinion on the matter perfectly clear.]
prettypurpleparlor: I have within my pantry (Table ready)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-05 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
[Muffet politely refrains from rolling all five of her eyes at the idea.]

Well, I certainly can't say that hard work is a bad thing, although I'd point out that even the most gifted natural talent would have to spend time and effort honing their skills if they ever wanted to use them to their full potential.
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-05 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
My experience with wizards has generally been that they have an arrogant assumption that their own abilities are both superior and standalone.

I could go into further detail but you don't really want to hear about my father issues and I'm trying to put them behind me.
prettypurpleparlor: A subtle web (I'm sure you're very welcome)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-05 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Mm, I don't mind providing a listening ear if you want to complain to someone, but if you'd rather just move on that's fine too.

...Ah, for example: it occurs to me that magic is rather heavily tied in with species on my world, but other people seem to have plenty of options besides the two I'm used to. What kind of people does your world have, assuming it isn't just humans?
greatcleavage: (sometimes things do go right?)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-05 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
[Just humans. The idea brings a genuine grin to his face.]

All sorts. All sorts -- humans, halfings, elves, dwarves, gnomes just to start, orcs and goblins and their entire branches of goblinoid races, dragons of course, giants.... I could go on for a day, probably, and not entirely cover everything exhaustively.
prettypurpleparlor: Bidding you good morning now (Dear friend)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-06 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
[Muffet looks genuinely fascinated, smiling happily at the thought.]

My, that must be an interesting world to live in. Monsters do have a great deal of physical variation, enough that humans are often surprised our different subspecies are even related to each other at all, but in the end there's really only us and humans.

Are there any species you're more familiar with than others, out of the list?
greatcleavage: (confused)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-06 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, my adventuring party was three humans, a halfling, an elf, and until recently a dwarf. So I suppose those are my greatest areas of familiarity?
prettypurpleparlor: Thinking only (And I've a many curious things)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-06 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm... I've met a few elves here- they're the ones who look quite a bit like humans but with rather more pointed ears, yes? Halflings and dwarves, however, I've only heard mentioned here in passing. What are they like?
greatcleavage: Credit: <user name=great_cleavage site=livejournal.com> (sigh)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-07 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Dwarves are generally a stoic, beer-loving race that tends towards Lawfulness, hard work, occasionally strange ideas about trees, and respectful worship of the Northern gods. All in all, they're a very decent people from my limited experience with them. Durkon was my best friend for a very long time.

[Having been very prepared to say the name, Roy manages without a hitch.]

Halflings, well. Belkar was something else entirely.
prettypurpleparlor: A subtle web (I'm sure you're very welcome)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-08 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
[Muffet notices the past tense, but doesn't say anything about it, since it doesn't seem like it would be kind or polite to bring it up.]

That does sound like a lovely culture- except possibly for the part about trees?

[Does she even want to know, is the question.]

Are they very physically similar to humans, like the elves I've met, or are they more varied? From the name I would perhaps guess that they tend to be rather short, but it seems rude to assume...
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-09 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Dwarves are somewhat shorter than humans, generally under four feet, while halflings are shorter still. Halflings are generally fairly human-proportionate, while dwarves tend to have shorter limbs and more length of torso, relatively speaking.
prettypurpleparlor: I have within my pantry (Table ready)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-11 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
But still fairly humanoid, I'm assuming? No wings or tails or the like.
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-12 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yes. The most common races all follow that basic template. There are a few exceptions, like tieflings, which tend to have tails, but they're still quite uncommon proportionally, just overrepresented in the adventuring population.
prettypurpleparlor: Thinking only (And I've a many curious things)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-16 08:14 am (UTC)(link)
Fascinating... monsters tend to have much more varied body types than humans do- there are quite a few that aren't even solid, and plenty more that aren't nearly as humanoid in shape as I am. I believe the assumption is that there's less of a difference because humans have to stick to what works with biology in order to survive, whereas a monster can make up the gaps with magic even if they wouldn't otherwise be able to function.

What makes tieflings in particular an exception to the template, do you know? Do they just happen to have tails, or are they notably more magical than other species?
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-16 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
What we call 'monsters' are the most part biological creatures, although some of them may have more or less magic inherent in them which supports what isn't actually biologically possible.

Honestly, from what you've described monsters as, you seem closer to creatures from the outer planes... which, speaking of tieflings, they are partly descended from. Tieflings have devilish heritage.
prettypurpleparlor: I have within my pantry (Table ready)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-16 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh? How are we similar?

As I've said, we only have the one plane of reality to work with at home, as far as anyone can prove just yet, so I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the concept of outer planes to be certain.
greatcleavage: (talky man)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-17 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, extraplanar creatures are in many ways more spiritual than physical, and oftentimes are so magical it's impossible to separate it from their biology. The outer planes are, among other things, where mortal souls go after death.
prettypurpleparlor: A subtle web (I'm sure you're very welcome)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-17 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
That does sound like a very close match to our state, save for the fact that we're native to the same world as humanity.

I think there are a few old myths that we originally came from... mm, someplace higher and greater than the physical world, that our ancestors descended long ago and chose to remain for whatever reason. But honestly, there are a great many myths, and that one always seemed to me a tad too smug about the idea. We're not any better or worse than most people, I think, just more magic and less matter.

As for where souls go after death...

[She shrugs delicately.]

Most monster souls fade from the world near immediately, humans and some rare, very powerful monsters can linger for a time, but they still don't last very long without something to contain them. Where it is any of them go once they vanish from our world completely, no one's certain.
greatcleavage: (confused)

[personal profile] greatcleavage 2017-12-18 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, honestly, even if you came from a higher plane, there are a lot of outer planes. The sort of smugness about it all is... well, it seems par for the course if my theory is correct, honestly. Do you have ghosts?

[That might answer a few questions, if monster souls can actually linger, chained to their earthly demense.]
prettypurpleparlor: Thinking only (And I've a many curious things)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor 2017-12-18 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah... well, yes and no.

I'm assuming you mean ghosts in the sense of wandering spirits, those dead but not gone? As far as I'm aware, those only exist in my world in stories and superstitions- neither humans or monsters leave them behind. A soul can be captured or taken by someone actively trying, but they don't just linger of their own accord.

What we do have is a subspecies of monster that are naturally incorporeal, who can possess and control inanimate objects in order to interact with the physical world. They're born, live, and die just like anyone else- but they are called ghosts, and the name caused no end of confusion when we were first reconnecting with humanity.

(no subject)

[personal profile] greatcleavage - 2017-12-19 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor - 2017-12-22 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greatcleavage - 2017-12-24 17:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor - 2017-12-25 20:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greatcleavage - 2017-12-26 14:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor - 2017-12-30 21:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greatcleavage - 2017-12-30 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] prettypurpleparlor - 2017-12-30 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greatcleavage - 2018-01-01 16:41 (UTC) - Expand